Exfiltration to Text Storage Sites
Exfiltration to Text Storage Sites [T1567.003]
Information
Introduction
Exfiltration to Text Storage Sites (T1567.003) is a sub-technique within the MITRE ATT&CK framework categorized under "Exfiltration." Attackers employing this method leverage publicly accessible text storage services, such as Pastebin, GitHub Gists, and other similar platforms, to exfiltrate stolen data from compromised environments. These platforms typically allow users to paste and publicly share text-based information anonymously or pseudo-anonymously, making them attractive channels for covertly moving sensitive data out of targeted networks.
Deep Dive Into Technique
Attackers utilizing this sub-technique typically follow a structured process to exfiltrate data:
Data Collection and Preparation:
Attackers initially gather sensitive information from compromised systems, such as credentials, intellectual property, personal identifiable information (PII), or financial records.
Data may be compressed, encoded (e.g., Base64), encrypted, or obfuscated to avoid detection and reduce size.
Choice of Text Storage Service:
Attackers select publicly accessible text storage platforms, such as:
Pastebin
GitHub Gist
Ghostbin
Paste.ee
Hastebin
PrivateBin
The choice depends on factors such as anonymity, ease of automation, API availability, and minimal restrictions on content.
Automated or Manual Upload:
Attackers may manually paste data onto these platforms or automate exfiltration through scripts, bots, or malware capable of interacting with APIs provided by these services.
Automation methods typically involve HTTP POST requests to APIs or web interfaces, often disguised as legitimate web traffic.
Data Retrieval and Cleanup:
Attackers subsequently access the uploaded content from external locations using direct URLs or API endpoints.
Some attackers delete or set expiration times for uploaded content to minimize digital footprints.
Obfuscation and Evasion Techniques:
Attackers may split data across multiple posts or accounts to evade detection thresholds.
Data may be encoded or encrypted to further avoid detection by automated security tools.
When this Technique is Usually Used
Attackers commonly employ exfiltration to text storage sites during several critical stages of cyberattacks:
Data Exfiltration Stage:
After gaining initial access and escalating privileges, attackers often use this sub-technique to remove sensitive information from internal networks to external locations.
Command and Control (C2) Communications:
Attackers may leverage text storage sites as intermediary channels for command and control instructions, especially in scenarios where direct network connections to attacker-controlled infrastructure are restricted or monitored.
Persistence and Long-term Access:
Attackers might periodically exfiltrate data or instructions via text storage services to maintain persistent covert communication channels over extended periods.
Attack scenarios include:
Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) campaigns targeting government, military, or corporate entities.
Cybercriminal groups exfiltrating stolen credentials or financial data during ransomware attacks.
Insider threat scenarios where malicious insiders discreetly leak sensitive corporate data anonymously.
How this Technique is Usually Detected
Detection of data exfiltration to text storage sites typically involves multiple layers of monitoring and analysis:
Network Traffic Analysis:
Monitoring outbound HTTP/HTTPS traffic for unusual patterns or frequent connections to known text storage domains (e.g., pastebin.com, gist.github.com, ghostbin.com).
Inspecting large or repeated POST requests to text storage services.
Endpoint Monitoring and Behavioral Analysis:
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions can detect unusual processes or scripts initiating HTTP connections or API requests to text storage sites.
Behavioral anomaly detection can identify unexpected or unauthorized applications initiating outbound connections.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Solutions:
DLP tools configured to detect sensitive data patterns (such as credit card numbers, social security numbers, or proprietary information) leaving the network through HTTP POST requests or uploads.
Threat Intelligence and Reputation-based Detection:
Leveraging threat intelligence feeds and reputation databases to flag known malicious or suspicious text storage platforms or specific URLs used for exfiltration.
Indicators of Compromise (IoCs):
URLs or domains associated with known text storage services.
Suspicious API requests or HTTP POST requests to known text storage APIs.
Network logs indicating repeated or automated access to text storage services.
Endpoint logs showing scripts or processes interacting with text storage sites.
Why it is Important to Detect This Technique
Timely detection of exfiltration to text storage sites is critical due to the following potential impacts and risks:
Data Breaches and Information Loss:
Sensitive corporate, governmental, or personal data may be leaked, causing severe financial, reputational, and regulatory consequences.
Operational Disruption:
Undetected exfiltration activities often precede disruptive attacks, including ransomware or sabotage, potentially leading to significant operational downtime.
Regulatory and Compliance Violations:
Organizations failing to detect and respond to data exfiltration incidents may face severe regulatory penalties under GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and other compliance frameworks.
Damage to Reputation and Trust:
Public disclosure of data breaches significantly damages customer trust, brand reputation, and stakeholder confidence.
Facilitation of Further Attacks:
Attackers using text storage sites for exfiltration may also leverage these channels for command and control, persistence, and lateral movement, prolonging their presence within compromised networks.
Early detection and rapid response reduce damage, limit attacker dwell time, and mitigate potential long-term impacts.
Examples
Real-world examples demonstrating the use of exfiltration to text storage sites include:
APT41 (Winnti Group):
Attackers associated with APT41 have been observed exfiltrating stolen credentials and sensitive data to publicly accessible services, including Pastebin, as part of espionage and financially motivated campaigns targeting multiple industries worldwide.
Impact: Intellectual property theft, financial losses, and compromised corporate infrastructure.
FIN7 Cybercriminal Group:
FIN7 leveraged Pastebin and similar text storage platforms to store stolen payment card data temporarily during their campaigns targeting retail and hospitality sectors.
Impact: Massive financial fraud, compromised customer payment data, and significant financial and reputational damage to affected organizations.
Operation Transparent Tribe (APT36):
APT36 has been observed utilizing Pastebin and GitHub Gists to exfiltrate sensitive military and diplomatic information from targeted entities in government and defense sectors.
Impact: Exposure of sensitive diplomatic and military information, potential national security threats, and operational compromise.
Malware Campaigns Utilizing Pastebin:
Multiple malware families (e.g., njRAT, RevengeRAT) have leveraged text storage sites for C2 instructions and data exfiltration, enabling attackers to maintain anonymity and evade traditional detection mechanisms.
Impact: Persistent infections, unauthorized access, data theft, and prolonged attacker presence within compromised networks.
Last updated
Was this helpful?